Skip to Content
Main content

VAN WYCK JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,164

LEVEL 1

331

28%

LEVEL 2

522

45%

LEVEL 3

250

21%

LEVEL 4

61

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

104

22%

LEVEL 2

197

42%

LEVEL 3

111

24%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

155

28%

LEVEL 2

261

47%

LEVEL 3

118

21%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

47

21%

LEVEL 2

100

45%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

170
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

176

29%

LEVEL 2

261

43%

LEVEL 3

132

22%

LEVEL 4

38

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

25

42%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

19

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

247
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 933

LEVEL 1

271

29%

LEVEL 2

415

44%

LEVEL 3

202

22%

LEVEL 4

45

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

74

23%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

31

60%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

18

60%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

38

34%

LEVEL 2

52

47%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

15

26%

LEVEL 2

29

51%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 972

LEVEL 1

184

19%

LEVEL 2

486

50%

LEVEL 3

241

25%

LEVEL 4

61

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

57

14%

LEVEL 2

176

44%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

147

77%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

47

65%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

282
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 970

LEVEL 1

244

25%

LEVEL 2

444

46%

LEVEL 3

226

23%

LEVEL 4

56

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

161

42%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

87

45%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

31

37%

LEVEL 2

36

43%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.