POUGHKEEPSIE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,000

LEVEL 1

1,364

68%

LEVEL 2

497

25%

LEVEL 3

115

6%

LEVEL 4

24

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,703

LEVEL 1

1,157

68%

LEVEL 2

404

24%

LEVEL 3

124

7%

LEVEL 4

18

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 951

LEVEL 1

634

67%

LEVEL 2

249

26%

LEVEL 3

58

6%

LEVEL 4

10

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

520

66%

LEVEL 2

196

25%

LEVEL 3

64

8%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,049

LEVEL 1

730

70%

LEVEL 2

248

24%

LEVEL 3

57

5%

LEVEL 4

14

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 916

LEVEL 1

637

70%

LEVEL 2

208

23%

LEVEL 3

60

7%

LEVEL 4

11

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

36

63%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

44

70%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

107

54%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

86

57%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

51
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,118

LEVEL 1

819

73%

LEVEL 2

248

22%

LEVEL 3

46

4%

LEVEL 4

5

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

54
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 906

LEVEL 1

644

71%

LEVEL 2

208

23%

LEVEL 3

50

6%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

392

65%

LEVEL 2

166

27%

LEVEL 3

34

6%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

371

66%

LEVEL 2

135

24%

LEVEL 3

48

9%

LEVEL 4

8

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,660

LEVEL 1

1,041

63%

LEVEL 2

483

29%

LEVEL 3

113

7%

LEVEL 4

23

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,410

LEVEL 1

880

62%

LEVEL 2

391

28%

LEVEL 3

121

9%

LEVEL 4

18

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

323

95%

LEVEL 2

14

4%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

277

95%

LEVEL 2

13

4%

LEVEL 3

3

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

138
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,801

LEVEL 1

1,184

66%

LEVEL 2

479

27%

LEVEL 3

114

6%

LEVEL 4

24

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

140
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,515

LEVEL 1

987

65%

LEVEL 2

388

26%

LEVEL 3

122

8%

LEVEL 4

18

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

180

90%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

170

90%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

156

56%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

169

60%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,721

LEVEL 1

1,208

70%

LEVEL 2

417

24%

LEVEL 3

79

5%

LEVEL 4

17

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,420

LEVEL 1

988

70%

LEVEL 2

323

23%

LEVEL 3

97

7%

LEVEL 4

12

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

142
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,696

LEVEL 1

1,151

68%

LEVEL 2

403

24%

LEVEL 3

124

7%

LEVEL 4

18

1%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.