Skip to Content
Main content

CORTLAND CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,091

LEVEL 1

385

35%

LEVEL 2

419

38%

LEVEL 3

195

18%

LEVEL 4

92

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

265

38%

LEVEL 2

224

32%

LEVEL 3

143

20%

LEVEL 4

72

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

209

39%

LEVEL 2

188

35%

LEVEL 3

94

17%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

136

39%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

176

32%

LEVEL 2

231

42%

LEVEL 3

101

18%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

129

36%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

17

46%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

258
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 936

LEVEL 1

326

35%

LEVEL 2

352

38%

LEVEL 3

174

19%

LEVEL 4

84

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

223

37%

LEVEL 2

195

32%

LEVEL 3

129

21%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

16

29%

LEVEL 2

29

52%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 954

LEVEL 1

263

28%

LEVEL 2

405

42%

LEVEL 3

194

20%

LEVEL 4

92

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

187

30%

LEVEL 2

218

35%

LEVEL 3

141

23%

LEVEL 4

72

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

122

89%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

78

91%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

97

21%

LEVEL 2

182

39%

LEVEL 3

122

26%

LEVEL 4

70

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

71

23%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

288

46%

LEVEL 2

237

38%

LEVEL 3

73

12%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

194

49%

LEVEL 2

124

31%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

285
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,085

LEVEL 1

384

35%

LEVEL 2

416

38%

LEVEL 3

193

18%

LEVEL 4

92

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.