Skip to Content
Main content

KINDERHOOK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

158

32%

LEVEL 2

182

37%

LEVEL 3

114

23%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

57

24%

LEVEL 2

91

38%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

74

32%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

24

23%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

84

32%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

10

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

75%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

141

31%

LEVEL 2

174

39%

LEVEL 3

100

22%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

56

26%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

62

69%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

29

67%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

151
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

136

29%

LEVEL 2

176

38%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

22

73%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

95

53%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

35

43%

LEVEL 2

34

42%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

152
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

151

31%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

88
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.