Skip to Content
Main content

FREDONIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

136

28%

LEVEL 2

175

36%

LEVEL 3

115

24%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

44

27%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

102

25%

LEVEL 2

149

36%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

27

55%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

83

19%

LEVEL 2

171

40%

LEVEL 3

114

26%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

53

91%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

32

74%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

177
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

127

27%

LEVEL 2

171

36%

LEVEL 3

114

24%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

9

90%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

79

45%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

41

39%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.