Skip to Content
Main content

FREWSBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

121

35%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

73

28%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

36

30%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

69

37%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

111

34%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

67

28%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

92

30%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

29

78%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

34

85%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

50

25%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

41

27%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

71

51%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

45

43%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.