VOORHEESVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

339
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

143

27%

LEVEL 3

175

33%

LEVEL 4

164

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

91

24%

LEVEL 3

153

40%

LEVEL 4

103

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

83

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

88

43%

LEVEL 4

57

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

81

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

65

37%

LEVEL 4

46

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

313
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

130

27%

LEVEL 3

165

34%

LEVEL 4

148

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

139

41%

LEVEL 4

92

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

123

27%

LEVEL 3

164

35%

LEVEL 4

161

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

149

43%

LEVEL 4

103

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

30

47%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

321
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

122

26%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

164

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

146

42%

LEVEL 4

102

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

18

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.