LATHAM RIDGE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

82

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

77

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

33

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

23

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

49

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

54

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

31

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

31

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

47

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

39

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

78

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

73

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

126
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

77

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

77

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

69

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

18

43%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.