Skip to Content
Main content

MATH & SCIENCE EXPLORATORY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

112

27%

LEVEL 3

125

30%

LEVEL 4

155

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

66

17%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

183

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

87

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

84

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

65

33%

LEVEL 4

96

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

15

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

22

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

101

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

22

11%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

114

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

25

35%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

23

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

25

36%

LEVEL 4

28

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

144

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

48

15%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

171

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

13

22%

LEVEL 2

29

48%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

18

34%

LEVEL 4

12

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

110

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

239
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

145

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

45

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

38

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.