Skip to Content
Main content

CORNWALL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

459
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 949

LEVEL 1

148

16%

LEVEL 2

342

36%

LEVEL 3

295

31%

LEVEL 4

164

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

65

11%

LEVEL 2

186

32%

LEVEL 3

188

32%

LEVEL 4

142

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

225
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

71

15%

LEVEL 2

171

37%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

80

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

68

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

234
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

77

16%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

150

31%

LEVEL 4

84

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

177
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

74

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

24

48%

LEVEL 4

13

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

22

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

343
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 680

LEVEL 1

93

14%

LEVEL 2

244

36%

LEVEL 3

215

32%

LEVEL 4

128

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

128

33%

LEVEL 4

95

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

23

46%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

30

22%

LEVEL 2

64

46%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

29

34%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

16

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 840

LEVEL 1

82

10%

LEVEL 2

307

37%

LEVEL 3

288

34%

LEVEL 4

163

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

166

32%

LEVEL 3

178

34%

LEVEL 4

140

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

66

61%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

30

48%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

459
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 944

LEVEL 1

145

15%

LEVEL 2

340

36%

LEVEL 3

295

31%

LEVEL 4

164

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

411
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 790

LEVEL 1

105

13%

LEVEL 2

274

35%

LEVEL 3

261

33%

LEVEL 4

150

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

290
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

152

31%

LEVEL 3

156

32%

LEVEL 4

134

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

43

27%

LEVEL 2

68

43%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.