Skip to Content
Main content

HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE PROMISE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

103

20%

LEVEL 2

223

43%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

109

21%

LEVEL 2

168

32%

LEVEL 3

160

30%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

107

42%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

171
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

93

20%

LEVEL 2

209

44%

LEVEL 3

110

23%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

217
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

92

20%

LEVEL 2

154

33%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

73

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

179

43%

LEVEL 3

115

28%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

133

33%

LEVEL 3

135

33%

LEVEL 4

77

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

48

45%

LEVEL 2

44

41%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

45

39%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

193
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

96

19%

LEVEL 2

218

43%

LEVEL 3

124

24%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

246
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

105

20%

LEVEL 2

165

32%

LEVEL 3

158

31%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

190

43%

LEVEL 3

110

25%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

92

21%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

74

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.