Skip to Content
Main content

ELIJAH STROUD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

153

60%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

136

59%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

58

56%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

50

52%

LEVEL 2

39

40%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

95

63%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

86

65%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

133

62%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

111

63%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

17

49%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

18

49%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

109

54%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

100

54%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

44

85%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

36

80%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

143

60%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

125

58%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

21

64%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

137

61%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

115

59%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.