Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER-HARLEM 1 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

489
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

35

7%

LEVEL 3

152

29%

LEVEL 4

337

64%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

500
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

51

9%

LEVEL 3

145

26%

LEVEL 4

355

63%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

252
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

18

7%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

165

61%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

242
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

30

11%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

170

61%

MALE

PROFICIENT

237
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

172

67%

MALE

PROFICIENT

258
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

185

65%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

11
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

387
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

28

7%

LEVEL 3

123

29%

LEVEL 4

264

63%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

380
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

38

9%

LEVEL 3

108

25%

LEVEL 4

272

63%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

63

70%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

66

63%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

425
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

18

4%

LEVEL 3

123

28%

LEVEL 4

302

68%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

439
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

29

6%

LEVEL 3

117

25%

LEVEL 4

322

69%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

64
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

29

35%

LEVEL 4

35

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

61
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

33

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

482
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

32

6%

LEVEL 3

150

29%

LEVEL 4

332

64%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

494
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

48

9%

LEVEL 3

144

26%

LEVEL 4

350

63%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

62

66%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

13

7%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

114

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

401
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

30

7%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

275

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

338
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

38

10%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

241

63%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.