Skip to Content
Main content

MIDDLE SCHOOL FOR ART AND PHILOSOPHY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

170

56%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

122

53%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

77

53%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

52

48%

LEVEL 2

43

40%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

93

58%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

70

57%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

155

57%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

113

53%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

130

52%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

90

47%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

40

77%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

32

80%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

155

54%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

108

50%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

15

88%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

14

88%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

152

56%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

114

54%

LEVEL 2

83

39%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.