Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

61

45%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

32

49%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

34

52%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

29

41%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

22

29%

LEVEL 2

28

36%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

18

47%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

21

46%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

39

48%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

26

31%

LEVEL 2

39

47%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

47

43%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

47

43%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

14

56%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

57

45%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

7

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

20

19%

LEVEL 2

49

46%

LEVEL 3

31

29%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

33

28%

LEVEL 2

53

46%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.