Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

133

29%

LEVEL 2

208

45%

LEVEL 3

90

20%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

186

33%

LEVEL 2

221

39%

LEVEL 3

131

23%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

54

26%

LEVEL 2

103

49%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

76

29%

LEVEL 2

106

41%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

105

42%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

110

36%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

116
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

126

29%

LEVEL 2

193

44%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

152
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

176

33%

LEVEL 2

211

39%

LEVEL 3

126

23%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

11

65%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

102

25%

LEVEL 2

188

46%

LEVEL 3

89

22%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

137

28%

LEVEL 2

204

41%

LEVEL 3

128

26%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

31

57%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

49

70%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

159
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

182

32%

LEVEL 2

220

39%

LEVEL 3

131

23%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

17

23%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

16

21%

LEVEL 2

36

46%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

116

30%

LEVEL 2

180

47%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

170

35%

LEVEL 2

185

38%

LEVEL 3

108

22%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.