Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 4 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

16

6%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

190

69%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

243

72%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

94

68%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

161
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

121

72%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

96

70%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

122

72%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

191
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

142

69%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

235
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

180

73%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

18

29%

LEVEL 4

42

67%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

23

31%

LEVEL 4

52

69%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

169

74%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

218

77%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

21

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

44
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

19

36%

LEVEL 4

25

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

253
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

16

6%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

188

70%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

316
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

237

72%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

43

77%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

62

79%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

14

6%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

147

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

181

70%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.