Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN SCHOLARS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

85

25%

LEVEL 2

154

46%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

86

22%

LEVEL 2

170

44%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

45

26%

LEVEL 2

77

45%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

98

49%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

77

48%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

48

26%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

64
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

117

47%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

122

44%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

30

46%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

37

47%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

143

46%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

159

45%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

67

46%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

53

28%

LEVEL 2

87

46%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

95

45%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.