Skip to Content
Main content

SCIENCE & MEDICINE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

205

59%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

198

41%

LEVEL 2

188

39%

LEVEL 3

74

15%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

105

62%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

88

36%

LEVEL 2

98

40%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

100

55%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

69

22%

LEVEL 2

188

61%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

82
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

179

42%

LEVEL 2

168

39%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

18

47%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

180

61%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

140

34%

LEVEL 2

173

43%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

29

51%

LEVEL 2

25

44%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

58

79%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

76

23%

LEVEL 2

200

59%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

186

40%

LEVEL 2

182

39%

LEVEL 3

74

16%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

45

66%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

160

57%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

148

43%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

49

14%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.