Skip to Content
Main content

COLLABORATIVE ARTS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

239

53%

LEVEL 2

168

38%

LEVEL 3

33

7%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

259

60%

LEVEL 2

131

31%

LEVEL 3

32

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

110

49%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

115

55%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

129

58%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

144

65%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

221

54%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

30

7%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

237

60%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

28

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

170

47%

LEVEL 2

149

41%

LEVEL 3

33

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

179

53%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

69

78%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

80

89%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

41
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

231

53%

LEVEL 2

166

38%

LEVEL 3

33

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

39
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

252

60%

LEVEL 2

130

31%

LEVEL 3

32

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

45

52%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

77

59%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

194

54%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

29

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

182

61%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.