ALEXANDER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

115

40%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

23

70%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

21

66%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

41

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

40

43%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

48

44%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.