Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

99

20%

LEVEL 2

160

33%

LEVEL 3

158

33%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

85

17%

LEVEL 2

150

30%

LEVEL 3

164

33%

LEVEL 4

98

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

99

36%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

110
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

126
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

147
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

56

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

138

35%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

122

30%

LEVEL 3

146

36%

LEVEL 4

94

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

43

46%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

44

47%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

219
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

151

33%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

256
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

75

16%

LEVEL 2

141

30%

LEVEL 3

159

34%

LEVEL 4

97

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

145

32%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

141

30%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.