Skip to Content
Main content

PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

46

10%

LEVEL 2

122

27%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

151

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

115

24%

LEVEL 3

137

29%

LEVEL 4

178

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

71

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

88

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

80

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

90

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

12

48%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

19

59%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

14

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

15

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

110

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

131

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

33

46%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

109

27%

LEVEL 3

125

31%

LEVEL 4

150

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

177

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

29

63%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

101

25%

LEVEL 3

123

31%

LEVEL 4

147

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

302
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

172

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

21

48%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.