Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

452
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

44

7%

LEVEL 2

131

21%

LEVEL 3

237

38%

LEVEL 4

215

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

405
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

135

23%

LEVEL 3

193

33%

LEVEL 4

212

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

223
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

115

36%

LEVEL 4

108

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

194
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

100

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

229
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

61

20%

LEVEL 3

122

39%

LEVEL 4

107

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

211
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

112

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

10

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

11

42%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

388
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

110

21%

LEVEL 3

206

39%

LEVEL 4

182

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

349
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

111

23%

LEVEL 3

166

34%

LEVEL 4

183

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

430
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

88

17%

LEVEL 3

220

42%

LEVEL 4

210

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

379
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

99

20%

LEVEL 3

174

36%

LEVEL 4

205

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

32

33%

LEVEL 2

43

44%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

33

35%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

444
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

120

20%

LEVEL 3

233

39%

LEVEL 4

211

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

394
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

122

22%

LEVEL 3

185

34%

LEVEL 4

209

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.