Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENSBURY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

65

17%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

144

37%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

106

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

72

38%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

45

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

61

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

141

38%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

97

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

144

42%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

104

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

39

81%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

27

66%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

125

42%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

94

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

26

26%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.