Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM T ROGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

110

35%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

96

42%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

60

37%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

51

48%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

47

39%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

69

35%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

108

39%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

85

41%

LEVEL 3

79

39%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

23

59%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

160
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

110

35%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

106

37%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

85

42%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.