Skip to Content
Main content

COBLESKILL-RICHMONDVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

143

29%

LEVEL 2

185

37%

LEVEL 3

110

22%

LEVEL 4

61

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

153

27%

LEVEL 2

213

37%

LEVEL 3

129

23%

LEVEL 4

74

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

84

31%

LEVEL 2

99

37%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

85

29%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

128

28%

LEVEL 2

173

38%

LEVEL 3

100

22%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

139

27%

LEVEL 2

193

37%

LEVEL 3

124

24%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

99

22%

LEVEL 2

176

40%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

124

24%

LEVEL 2

203

39%

LEVEL 3

127

24%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

44

80%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

29

69%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

107

35%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.