Skip to Content
Main content

GOUVERNEUR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

191

43%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

162

38%

LEVEL 2

150

35%

LEVEL 3

81

19%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

80

40%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

62

32%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

111

46%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

100

43%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

186

43%

LEVEL 2

140

33%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

154

38%

LEVEL 2

145

36%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

120

34%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

100

29%

LEVEL 2

136

39%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

71

78%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

62

81%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

68

42%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

142

51%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

128

49%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

104
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

187

43%

LEVEL 2

140

32%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

111
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

151

37%

LEVEL 2

147

36%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.