ALGONQUIN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

80

20%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

87

21%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

79

44%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

74

19%

LEVEL 2

150

39%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

135

36%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

141

40%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

34

63%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

36

64%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

133

39%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

27

41%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

29

39%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.