AVERILL PARK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

414
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 855

LEVEL 1

146

17%

LEVEL 2

295

35%

LEVEL 3

248

29%

LEVEL 4

166

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

497
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 901

LEVEL 1

146

16%

LEVEL 2

258

29%

LEVEL 3

289

32%

LEVEL 4

208

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

186
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

166

40%

LEVEL 3

116

28%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

247
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

139

31%

LEVEL 3

149

33%

LEVEL 4

98

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

228
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

87

20%

LEVEL 2

129

29%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

96

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

250
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

78

17%

LEVEL 2

119

27%

LEVEL 3

140

31%

LEVEL 4

110

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

394
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 803

LEVEL 1

133

17%

LEVEL 2

276

34%

LEVEL 3

238

30%

LEVEL 4

156

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

470
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 835

LEVEL 1

128

15%

LEVEL 2

237

28%

LEVEL 3

276

33%

LEVEL 4

194

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

407
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 748

LEVEL 1

74

10%

LEVEL 2

267

36%

LEVEL 3

243

32%

LEVEL 4

164

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

482
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 791

LEVEL 1

79

10%

LEVEL 2

230

29%

LEVEL 3

280

35%

LEVEL 4

202

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

72

67%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

67

61%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

414
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 850

LEVEL 1

142

17%

LEVEL 2

294

35%

LEVEL 3

248

29%

LEVEL 4

166

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

496
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 896

LEVEL 1

145

16%

LEVEL 2

255

28%

LEVEL 3

288

32%

LEVEL 4

208

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

377
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 705

LEVEL 1

86

12%

LEVEL 2

242

34%

LEVEL 3

228

32%

LEVEL 4

149

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

432
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 715

LEVEL 1

86

12%

LEVEL 2

197

28%

LEVEL 3

245

34%

LEVEL 4

187

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

60

40%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.