SKANEATELES CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

151

31%

LEVEL 3

181

37%

LEVEL 4

125

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

53

10%

LEVEL 2

148

29%

LEVEL 3

178

35%

LEVEL 4

132

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

86

37%

LEVEL 4

56

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

82

37%

LEVEL 4

49

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

95

37%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

83

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

7

58%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

292
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

147

31%

LEVEL 3

172

36%

LEVEL 4

120

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

294
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

142

29%

LEVEL 3

168

34%

LEVEL 4

126

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

145

31%

LEVEL 3

178

38%

LEVEL 4

123

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

134

29%

LEVEL 3

176

37%

LEVEL 4

132

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

295
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

171

37%

LEVEL 4

124

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

288
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

126

28%

LEVEL 3

165

36%

LEVEL 4

123

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.