MARCELLUS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

348
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

107

17%

LEVEL 2

166

27%

LEVEL 3

219

35%

LEVEL 4

129

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

59

9%

LEVEL 2

178

28%

LEVEL 3

206

33%

LEVEL 4

183

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

169
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

84

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

117

34%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

214
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

99

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

7

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

334
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

100

17%

LEVEL 2

160

27%

LEVEL 3

212

36%

LEVEL 4

122

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

375
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

58

10%

LEVEL 2

173

29%

LEVEL 3

200

33%

LEVEL 4

175

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

341
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

64

12%

LEVEL 2

151

27%

LEVEL 3

215

39%

LEVEL 4

126

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

164

29%

LEVEL 3

195

34%

LEVEL 4

179

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

43

66%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

22

43%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

317
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

137

26%

LEVEL 3

194

37%

LEVEL 4

123

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

335
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

137

27%

LEVEL 3

173

34%

LEVEL 4

162

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

38

39%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.