Skip to Content
Main content

HARRY F ABATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

159

49%

LEVEL 2

81

25%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

74

46%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

81

50%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

66

43%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

78

47%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

31

60%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

39

34%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

31

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

79

58%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

75

60%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

99

37%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

115

41%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

41

89%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

44

94%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

16

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

22

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

133

51%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

145

55%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.