Skip to Content
Main content

PS 2 ALFRED ZIMBERG GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

77

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

106

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

32

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

51

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

45

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

55

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

29

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

29

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

27

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

46

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

21

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

44

38%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

76

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

104

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

22

58%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

157
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

71

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

178
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

106

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

20

41%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

28

36%

LEVEL 4

23

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

42

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

64

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.