Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #27 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,013
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,502

LEVEL 1

6,709

33%

LEVEL 2

6,780

33%

LEVEL 3

4,364

21%

LEVEL 4

2,649

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,844
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,610

LEVEL 1

6,657

32%

LEVEL 2

7,109

34%

LEVEL 3

4,037

20%

LEVEL 4

2,807

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,502
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,882

LEVEL 1

3,036

31%

LEVEL 2

3,344

34%

LEVEL 3

2,172

22%

LEVEL 4

1,330

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,403
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,921

LEVEL 1

3,060

31%

LEVEL 2

3,458

35%

LEVEL 3

2,013

20%

LEVEL 4

1,390

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,511
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,620

LEVEL 1

3,673

35%

LEVEL 2

3,436

32%

LEVEL 3

2,192

21%

LEVEL 4

1,319

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,441
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,689

LEVEL 1

3,597

34%

LEVEL 2

3,651

34%

LEVEL 3

2,024

19%

LEVEL 4

1,417

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

20

28%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

38
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

18

22%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

230
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

213

31%

LEVEL 2

248

36%

LEVEL 3

148

21%

LEVEL 4

82

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

243
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

258

34%

LEVEL 2

269

35%

LEVEL 3

140

18%

LEVEL 4

103

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,465
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,923

LEVEL 1

902

18%

LEVEL 2

1,556

32%

LEVEL 3

1,332

27%

LEVEL 4

1,133

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,471
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,977

LEVEL 1

893

18%

LEVEL 2

1,613

32%

LEVEL 3

1,252

25%

LEVEL 4

1,219

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,143
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,203

LEVEL 1

426

19%

LEVEL 2

634

29%

LEVEL 3

672

31%

LEVEL 4

471

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,084
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,183

LEVEL 1

461

21%

LEVEL 2

638

29%

LEVEL 3

577

26%

LEVEL 4

507

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

943
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,086

LEVEL 1

2,484

49%

LEVEL 2

1,659

33%

LEVEL 3

668

13%

LEVEL 4

275

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

812
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,952

LEVEL 1

2,413

49%

LEVEL 2

1,727

35%

LEVEL 3

575

12%

LEVEL 4

237

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,203
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,528

LEVEL 1

2,664

35%

LEVEL 2

2,661

35%

LEVEL 3

1,530

20%

LEVEL 4

673

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,196
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,645

LEVEL 1

2,614

34%

LEVEL 2

2,835

37%

LEVEL 3

1,476

19%

LEVEL 4

720

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,491
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,247

LEVEL 1

4,061

25%

LEVEL 2

5,695

35%

LEVEL 3

3,969

24%

LEVEL 4

2,522

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,350
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,268

LEVEL 1

3,977

24%

LEVEL 2

5,941

37%

LEVEL 3

3,675

23%

LEVEL 4

2,675

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

522
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,255

LEVEL 1

2,648

62%

LEVEL 2

1,085

25%

LEVEL 3

395

9%

LEVEL 4

127

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

494
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,342

LEVEL 1

2,680

62%

LEVEL 2

1,168

27%

LEVEL 3

362

8%

LEVEL 4

132

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,832
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,769

LEVEL 1

5,589

30%

LEVEL 2

6,348

34%

LEVEL 3

4,226

23%

LEVEL 4

2,606

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,694
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,887

LEVEL 1

5,546

29%

LEVEL 2

6,647

35%

LEVEL 3

3,935

21%

LEVEL 4

2,759

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

181
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,733

LEVEL 1

1,120

65%

LEVEL 2

432

25%

LEVEL 3

138

8%

LEVEL 4

43

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,723

LEVEL 1

1,111

64%

LEVEL 2

462

27%

LEVEL 3

102

6%

LEVEL 4

48

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,120
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,766

LEVEL 1

1,215

25%

LEVEL 2

1,431

30%

LEVEL 3

1,231

26%

LEVEL 4

889

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,068
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,856

LEVEL 1

1,232

25%

LEVEL 2

1,556

32%

LEVEL 3

1,104

23%

LEVEL 4

964

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,893
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,736

LEVEL 1

5,494

35%

LEVEL 2

5,349

34%

LEVEL 3

3,133

20%

LEVEL 4

1,760

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,776
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,754

LEVEL 1

5,425

34%

LEVEL 2

5,553

35%

LEVEL 3

2,933

19%

LEVEL 4

1,843

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.