Skip to Content
Main content

MS 180 DR DANIEL HALE WILLIAMS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 844

LEVEL 1

202

24%

LEVEL 2

355

42%

LEVEL 3

202

24%

LEVEL 4

85

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 826

LEVEL 1

220

27%

LEVEL 2

328

40%

LEVEL 3

168

20%

LEVEL 4

110

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

105

22%

LEVEL 2

205

44%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

112

24%

LEVEL 2

196

42%

LEVEL 3

101

22%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

11

35%

LEVEL 4

10

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

180
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

141

25%

LEVEL 2

252

44%

LEVEL 3

127

22%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

187
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

161

28%

LEVEL 2

236

40%

LEVEL 3

110

19%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 715

LEVEL 1

116

16%

LEVEL 2

314

44%

LEVEL 3

200

28%

LEVEL 4

85

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

137

19%

LEVEL 2

294

42%

LEVEL 3

164

23%

LEVEL 4

108

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

86

67%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

83

67%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

286
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 832

LEVEL 1

194

23%

LEVEL 2

352

42%

LEVEL 3

201

24%

LEVEL 4

85

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

115

44%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

73

27%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

154

27%

LEVEL 2

240

41%

LEVEL 3

137

24%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

147

26%

LEVEL 2

222

40%

LEVEL 3

111

20%

LEVEL 4

76

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.