Skip to Content
Main content

MS 243 CENTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

62

38%

LEVEL 4

69

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

75

45%

LEVEL 4

63

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

31

37%

LEVEL 4

36

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

41

46%

LEVEL 4

34

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

31

40%

LEVEL 4

33

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

34

44%

LEVEL 4

29

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

36

35%

LEVEL 4

51

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

46

43%

LEVEL 4

45

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

12

52%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

11

52%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

60

40%

LEVEL 4

68

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

70

45%

LEVEL 4

63

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

54

37%

LEVEL 4

65

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

64

43%

LEVEL 4

61

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

11

55%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.