Skip to Content
Main content

H B THOMPSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

57

18%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

152

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

135

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

66

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

64

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

30

17%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

86

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

71

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

130
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

91

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

129
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

90

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

54

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

42

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

150

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

133

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

16

52%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

244
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

148

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

54

18%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

144

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

130

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

8

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.