Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN PHILIP SOUSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

78

34%

LEVEL 4

74

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

78

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

38

36%

LEVEL 4

32

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

27

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

42

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

51

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

9

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

9

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

57

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

55

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

15

58%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

69

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

72

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

17

47%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

151
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

74

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

158
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

77

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

74

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

80

36%

LEVEL 4

76

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

13

76%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.