Skip to Content
Main content

DREXEL AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

242

45%

LEVEL 2

176

33%

LEVEL 3

87

16%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

83

30%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

117

46%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

125

45%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

38

49%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

203

46%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

79

32%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

195

42%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

101

42%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

47

68%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

23

64%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

112

32%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

78

43%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

130

72%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

52

55%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

14

35%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

228

46%

LEVEL 2

159

32%

LEVEL 3

81

16%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

76

30%

LEVEL 2

98

39%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.