Skip to Content
Main content

ROOSEVELT CHILDREN'S ACADEMY CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

117

42%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

102

34%

LEVEL 2

129

44%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

54

34%

LEVEL 2

74

46%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

55

41%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

55

41%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

97

43%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

106

45%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

16

37%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

18

41%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

91

33%

LEVEL 2

123

44%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

21

32%

LEVEL 2

29

45%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

81

35%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.