JAMES MONROE HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

293

90%

LEVEL 2

32

10%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

220

85%

LEVEL 2

35

14%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

148

90%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

125

85%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

145

89%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

95

85%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

131

90%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

82

84%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

151

89%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

130

87%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

230

87%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

63

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

185

86%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

125

78%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

108

97%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

95

96%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

15

94%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

278

89%

LEVEL 2

31

10%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

213

86%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.