Skip to Content
Main content

WAYLAND-COHOCTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

142

46%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

63

44%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

58

43%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

43

26%

LEVEL 2

79

47%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

139

46%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

132

47%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

53

41%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

42

35%

LEVEL 4

24

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

89

49%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.