COXSACKIE-ATHENS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

117

27%

LEVEL 2

177

41%

LEVEL 3

107

24%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

113

26%

LEVEL 2

170

40%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

89

41%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

99

26%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

153

41%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

169

43%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

75

20%

LEVEL 2

161

42%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

33

72%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

38

76%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

80

33%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

104

41%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

75

43%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.