Skip to Content
Main content

CATSKILL CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

140

37%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

154

36%

LEVEL 2

139

33%

LEVEL 3

77

18%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

64

33%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

90

39%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

87

34%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

103

34%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

27

57%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

22

43%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

20

40%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

59

80%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

62

70%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

150

36%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

101

49%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

113

48%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.