Skip to Content
Main content

MALONE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

161

43%

LEVEL 2

125

33%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

139

39%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

75

41%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

86

45%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

81

42%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

152

42%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

136

40%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

111

34%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

53

83%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

28

88%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

118

53%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

102

50%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

88
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

155

42%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

108
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

134

39%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.