Skip to Content
Main content

LORRAINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

133

48%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

153

47%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

73

49%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

79

47%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

60

47%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

74

46%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

46

38%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

44

31%

LEVEL 2

63

44%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

66

62%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

80

66%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

17

46%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

89

41%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

105

41%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

44

73%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

48

65%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

19

38%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

30

43%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

114

50%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

133

51%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.