GREENE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

66

41%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

38

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

98

39%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

38

61%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

26

51%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

54

35%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.