Skip to Content
Main content

GEORGE WASHINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

231

51%

LEVEL 2

161

35%

LEVEL 3

52

11%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

276

59%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

40

9%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

115

51%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

132

59%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

116

50%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

144

60%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

37

57%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

44

69%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

115

44%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

134

51%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

17

81%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

64

60%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

75

67%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

180

45%

LEVEL 2

159

39%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

225

55%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

40

10%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

51

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

51

93%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

37

34%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

31

33%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

194

56%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

245

66%

LEVEL 2

96

26%

LEVEL 3

22

6%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.