SOUTHWESTERN CSD AT JAMESTOWN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

110

24%

LEVEL 2

128

28%

LEVEL 3

125

28%

LEVEL 4

89

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

113

22%

LEVEL 2

189

37%

LEVEL 3

133

26%

LEVEL 4

79

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

97

24%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

81

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

196
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

96

21%

LEVEL 2

171

37%

LEVEL 3

123

27%

LEVEL 4

73

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

88

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

174

39%

LEVEL 3

133

30%

LEVEL 4

77

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

43

78%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

51

75%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

76

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

60

40%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

69

37%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.